General situation
Ayahuasca is used in Argentina in a variety of contexts, ranging from rituals conducted by itinerant indigenous shamans from Colombia and Peru, to locally-based therapy and natural healing centers focused on treating addiction and various other disorders. There is also an active branch of a Brazilian Santo Daime church, which for decades has carried out its ceremonies without suffering legal repercussions. Presently, it is difficult to gauge the full breadth of ayahuasca use in Argentina because of the brew’s unestablished legal status and the tense atmosphere created by string of prosecutions over the past few years. Our research indicates that caution should be exercised in using ayahuasca in Argentina at this time.
Ayahuasca is not listed specifically in Argentina’s drug control laws, but DMT, harmalina, and harmina are “Schedule I” controlled substances. This means that they are prohibited except for medical and scientific use. Prohibition of “Schedule I” substances includes importation, exportation, manufacture, distribution, sale, and possession, with penalties ranging from one month to 20 years in prison (plus monetary fines) and that vary according the nature of the infraction and surrounding circumstances. The administration of ayahuasca to others in exchange for monetary consideration – the most common scenario involving cases of legal prosecution in Argentina – risks a prison sentence of between four to 15 years plus a fine.
The legal status of ayahuasca in Argentina remains uncertain, even despite a considerable number of arrests and prosecutions since at least 2011. Unfortunately, our knowledge of the legal proceedings surrounding these events remains limited, and most case outcomes remain unknown, unverified, or still pending. While we are aware of both religious and therapeutic organizations administering ayahuasca in Argentina without incident, a string of prosecutions – including a large-scale federal crack-down on psychedelics and plant medicines in 2016 called “Operation Kambo” – indicate that there are considerable legal risks associated with the use of ayahuasca in Argentina. However, there is evidence to suggest that at least one recent prosecution at the provincial level resulted in the absolution and release of the shaman involved. Furthermore, we have yet to receive news of a jail sentence imposed in any of these cases.
Religious use of ayahuasca is not protected by law in Argentina. However, a Brazilian Santo Daime organization with a long-standing chapter in Argentina is in the process of petitioning the government for the legalization of ayahuasca for this purpose. The effort is still ongoing.
International law
The Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) subjects several psychoactive compounds contained in plant species to international control. DMT (N,N-dimetyltryptamine, a tryptamine alkaloid contained in Psychotria viridis and other plants generally used in the preparation of ayahuasca) is a Schedule I controlled substance in the Convention. However, according to the International Narcotic Control Board (INCB) Report for 2010 (par. 284) ‘no plants are currently controlled under that Convention […]. Preparations (e.g. decoctions for oral use) made from plants containing those active ingredients are also not under international control’.
There is no general consensus among judges and law enforcement officials on whether ayahuasca is illegal because it contains DMT, or not. It is up to national governments to make the final decision in their own jurisdictions on whether to impose controls on these plants and preparations, including ayahuasca.
National drug legislation
There are two key pieces of legislation governing the legality of ayahuasca in Argentina. The first is Law No. 23.737, which governs penalties associated with all “narcotics,” defined as any substance producing physical or mental dependency that is also specifically listed by the legislative power. The second is Law Law No. 19.303, which lists psychotropic substances under state control. DMT, harmalina, and harmina are “Lista I” controlled substances under this law, which means that they are prohibited except for medical and scientific use. The lists of Law No. 19.303 are maintained and updated by the National Food, Drug, and Medical Technology Administration (ANMAT) of the Ministry of Health. Additional prohibited substances are listed under Law No. 17.818, which brings national law into line with the schedules of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
Raw plant materials are not anticipated by Law No. 19.303, and the legal status of such materials is not defined. However, a federal judge in the province of Buenos Aires ruled that the possession of raw plant materials, including Banisteriopsis caapi, cannot be considered in and of itself an offense under Law No. 23.737 (see below).
Cases
We are aware of at least eight cases involving ayahuasca since 2011, but there may be many more that remain unreported. Four prosecutions have taken place in the province of Córdoba, two in the province of Jujuy, and one in the province of Corrientes. Additional prosecutions have likely taken place as a result of the 2016 “Operation Kambo” raids in Buenos Aires. In 2012, the publication of an academic chapter on the legal status of ayahuasca in Argentina contributed to the legal defense of at least two of these cases.
El Emilio Natural Therapy Center
The first case we are aware of began in August 2011, with a raid at the El Emilio Natural Therapy Center in Cerro Pan de Azúcar, Córdoba, which occurred during an ayahuasca ritual conducted for the treatment of persons with drug addictions. Seventeen persons were present when the raid took place and all were under the effects of ayahuasca. According to one witness, the police task force consisted of fifty officers from various departments who remained at the scene for five hours and seized one bottle ayahuasca. They did not make any arrests. One month later, charges were pressed against a native Argentinian facilitator and one other for the distribution of narcotics in exchange for money. The case remained stalled for three years awaiting a technical examination of the substance seized by the police, and today continues in limbo on account of arguments by the defense pertaining to police conduct during the raid.
Templo Solar Andino Pañihué
In September 2011, a follow-up raid took place at the Templo Solar Andino Pañihué in Dolores, Córdoba, involving the same police force that conducted the raid at El Emilio. In this instance, a practitioner identified as “Iván Quesada” was detained and charged with distributing ayahuasca.
Taita Crispín Chindoy
In October 2014, police raided an ayahuasca ritual taking place in a private home in Paso de la Patria, Corrientes. Thirty armed police officers interrupted a ritual involving twenty-seven participants. Colombian indigenous shaman and anthropologist Taita Crispín Chindoy and three others were charged with fraud and the illegal exercise of medicine (Article 208 of the Argentine Penal Code).
This followed what news sources describe as a lengthy investigation sparked by accusations that the rituals had caused physical and mental disorders in at least one participant. Notably, no one was charged with the sale or distribution of a narcotic. After 13 days of detention, the Colombian consulate in Argentina was able to secure shaman Crispín Chindoy’s provisional release following a favorable report from Interpol, following which he was obligated to remain in Corrientes until the conclusion of the case. In January 2015, Chindoy appears to have been absolved of the charges against him and had his passport returned.
Operation Kambo
In May 2016, a coordinated series of raids took place throughout the capital city Buenos Aires designated by the official code-name “Operation Kambo.” These raids targeted the organizers and affiliates of a specific series of indigenous medicine themed “rave/trance” events that attracted up to 200 paying participants per weekend. Nine people were detained and a large quantity of plant medicines was seized including five litres of ayahuasca. Also seized were quantities of LSD and ecstasy.
We have no information regarding any charges laid or any case outcomes associated with this event. Significant is the name of the operation itself – “Operation Kambo” – because while a small quantity of kambo was indeed seized in the raids, statements by authorities appearing in local newspapers characterized kambo as a substance containing DMT. The police investigation – which reports claim lasted seven months – appears not to have researched its namesake kambo, which is widely known not to contain DMT or any other controlled substance.
Villa Yacanto, Córdoba
In September 2016, police raided an ayahuasca ritual consisting of nine participants at a holistic medicine center in Villa Yacanto, Córdoba. Two individuals were detained and charged with the sale and attempted distribution of narcotic substances and two liters of ayahuasca were seized. No further details are known at this time.
Further Prosecutions
The fourth case out of Córdoba appears to have begun in April 2017, at the Taravella International Airport, again in Córdoba. Our sources are still unreliable in this case, but it appears to involve the seizure of four bottles of ayahuasca at customs. The two remaining cases we know about are took place in Jujuy, and sources indicate that they involve a Colombian taita and the Peruvian shaman Fernando Sánchez Muñoz, respectively. The Muñoz case is still ongoing, but was been released from federal prison following one month of detention. According to his lawyer, he will be permitted to remain free during the legal proceedings.
The Santo Daime Church
In 2005, the Centro Eclético da Fluente Luz Universal Raimundo Irineu Serra (CEFLURIS) attempted to register as a “church or religious community” with the Argentine Secretariat of Worship, an organ of the Argentine Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship. In 2006, its request was rejected on the grounds that ayahuasca is a “threat to public health.” In 2007, the organization appealed this decision on the basis that Section 14 of Argentina’s constitution protects freedom of religion.
For ten years this appeal remained in limbo awaiting a resolution, in spite of CEFLURIS having met a series of formal requirements set forth by both the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship and the Ministry of Public Health. These included presenting proof that ayahuasca is not a health risk, as well as drafting proposals for rigorous control systems for handling of the brew both in production and in administration to members during services. In 2016, a resolution was passed that refused the registration of CEFLURIS as a church or religion, with the only explanation for the delay being an informal verbal apology for the appeal getting lost in the system. The organization immediately took to the courts on the grounds that this decision violates its constitutional right to freedom of religion, a legal move that it was unable to exercise while the process was held up in administrative law channels. The outcome of this effort is still pending.
Raw Plant Materials Case
In the case of “Perez, Javier Oscar,” raw plant materials were deemed to be beyond the reach of Law No. 23.737. The defendant’s home was raided by the police and he was found to be in possession of an ephedra plant, peyote cacti, san pedro cacti, Banisteriopsis caapi, and cebil seeds. These were found to contain efedrine, mescaline, harmine, and tryptamines respectively. He was charged with possession of narcotics, but the judge ruled that the mere possession of these plant materials is not prohibited.
The judge’s reasoning was as follows. Firstly, these plant materials do not appear on the lists of prohibited substances promulgated by agencies of the executive power. Secondly, while he recognized that prohibited substances can be produced using the seized plant materials, such production requires a refinement process involving specialized knowledge and technology that the ordinary person should not be presumed to possess. Furthermore, the fact that a third-party can use the plants for these purposes should not cause the defendant to be found guilty of a crime. Finally, the judge was not convinced that the plants themselves contained a level of toxicity high enough to consider them “narcotics” as per the definition of Law No. 23.737. The decision was upheld by an appellate division court on technical grounds.
Updated: January 2018
Relevant documents
- Fax INCB 2001 Netherlands
- INCB letter ICEERS
- Hoasca 1971 Convention Legal Brief
- INCB Annual Report 2010
- INCB Annual Report 2012
- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- TNI/ICEERS Ayahuasca Policy Report
- ICEERS Technical Report on Ayahuasca
- Plantaforma Ayahuasca Report Spain (Spanish)
- Declaration of Principles of the Religious Groups who consume the Tea Hoasca
Categories:
Countries
Tags:
legality
, ayahuasca
, map
, Argentina